| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
David Bach--author of the popular Finish Rich series of personal finance books and the man who coined the term Latte Factor--has penned a new book entitled Go Green, Live Rich: 50 Simple Ways to Save the Earth and Get Rich Trying. It is a quick and interesting read, filled with a sense of purpose as well as easy steps that one can take to become a smarter consumer and live a greener lifestyle.
There is a widely held view out there that greening your lifestyle is an expensive and painful process. Bach deftly explodes this myth in 192 (recycled) pages. Early on in the book he revisits the Latte Factor concept, but tweaks it a bit and suggests we find our "Litter Factor."
I have long encouraged my readers to identify their Latte Factor and eliminate it to start saving money. But small changes such as not buying coffee in a disposable cup or water in a plastic bottle not only are good for your wallet, but they actually better the planet. In the same way that "little things" add up to drain your wealth, "small changes" add up to make a big difference for the Earth.Consider this: Every year, Americans drink more than 100 billion cups of coffee. Of those, 14.4 billion are served in disposable paper cups, enough to wrap the Earth 55 times if placed end to end! Plus, those paper cups contain a plastic lining made from a petro-chemical that would produce enough energy to heat 8,300 homes a year.
He goes on to briefly discuss bottled water, referencing what I think was the best article published last year--Charles Fishman's Message in a Bottle. This is just a snippet of the first chapter, but it contains advice that, if taken, can lead to serious change... and save you money to boot. The rest of the book has equally clear and concise thinking and advice that ranges from how to save money by becoming energy smart, to shopping green, to going green at work. The steps to going green and energy-efficiency aren't necessarily going to be completely new to people, but Bach revealing how taking them is ultimately cost-efficient probably will be.
You'll be hearing much more from Bach on this issue. His first stop will be on the Today Show next Monday discussing seven green steps that can save you 3,000 dollars a year. The book itself will be hitting the shelves on Tuesday of next week, and I think you could consider it's $14.95 list price as an investment in the future of your finances, and maybe, even the future of planet as well.
The following is an excerpt from the book Fast Profits in Hard Times by Jordan E. Goodman
Published by Business Plus; January 2008; 9780446581561
Copyright (c) 2008 Jordan E. Goodman
10 Strategies: An Overview
Fast Profits in Hard Times will teach you everything you need to know and give you specific resources (websites, toll-free numbers, etc) to implement the following 10 strategies:
Copyright (c) 2008 Jordan E. Goodman
Author
Jordan E. Goodman is a former Money magazine journalist and the author of several bestselling books, including Everyone's Money Book, The Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms, and Master Your Money Type. He provides financial advice to millions of people each month through regular appearances on radio call-in and TV shows and through his seminars to corporate, association, and university audiences. He has been a regular contributor to NBC News at Sunrise, The Marketplace Morning Report on Public Radio, and many other shows. He hosts a popular financial resources Web site, www.moneyanswers.com, and is the host of The Money Answers Show on the VoiceAmerica Radio Network at www.voiceamerica.com. You can find out more about this book at www.fastprofitsinhardtimes.com.
While this blog rarely covers personal finance books, I think that any time Jack Bogle puts pen to paper folks should take notice. His new book, The Little Book of Common Sense Investing, is another dose of refreshing common sense from the guy who created index funds as we know them today. Not to spoil anything, but there’s simply no great secrets revealed in this book. For years Bogle has been preaching a very simple and very powerful point. In today’s market the individual investor faces insurmountable odds over the long haul, after you factor in the transaction costs and the powerful incentives driving fund managers. Therefore buy low-cost index funds. End of story.
The charm of the book rests in Bogle’s sharp wit and spicy writing. Here’s a passage I particularly enjoyed:
As investors, all of us as a group earn the stock market’s return. As a group—I hope you’re sitting down for this astonishing revelation—we are average. Each extra return that one of us earns means that another of our fellow investors suffers a return shortfall of precisely the same dimension. Before the deduction of the costs of investing, beating the stock market is a zero-sum game.But the costs of playing the investment game both reduce the gains of the winners and increases the losses of the losers. So who wins? You know who wins. The man in the middle (actually, the men and women in the middle, the brokers, the investment bankers, the money managers, the marketers, the lawyers, the accountants, the operations departments of our financial system) is the only sure winner in the game of investing. Our financial croupiers always win. In the casino, the house always wins. In horse racing, the track always wins. Investing is no different. After the deduction of the costs of investing, beating the stock market is a loser’s game.
You don't see us do much with personal finance books here on the blog. The advice is always the same.
The Wall Street Journal attempted to talk about the category on their Weekend Edition. This is the most important part of the article:
[J.D. Roth's Getting Rich Slowly], rated highly by Technorati, a search engine for blogs, includes advice about choosing books like this: "Many books -- especially the good ones -- give similar advice: pay yourself first, establish an emergency fund, don't spend more than you earn, diversify, etc. Sound personal finance is basic stuff."
It is an opinion seconded by academics even more grounded in the field. "Any book that suggests it has a new way to riches should probably be a little suspect," says Prof. Kenneth Froewiss, a finance professor at New York University Stern School of Business. A good book about personal finance, he says, always elaborates on three simple themes: Save early, know your risk tolerance and diversify.
I think I proved my point.
The Wall Street Journal shows their love for More Than You Know today. Here is a piece:
Delightful examples follow from a variety of disciplines. The short period over which the average company can sustain a competitive advantage is likened to the lifespan of a fruit fly. The fatal risks of imitation by money managers are illustrated by ants who tend to follow one another in an endless circle, marching on and on until death. Mr. Mauboussin explains how Tupperware parties, where people buy lots more stuff than they need, provide important lessons for stock-market investors; how Tiger Woods's decision to change his golf swing even when he was winning reflects the "fitness landscapes" concept in evolutionary biology; and why gambling legend Puggy Pearson can help you be a better investor ("Ain't only three things to gambling: Knowin' the 60-40 end of a proposition, money management, and knowin' yourself").
What is also great about the review is the author--Burton Malkiel. He is the author of a different book you should be familiar with--A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Jack and I both highly recommend this book.
In the area of personal finance, there are two types of books
The books of William Bernstein are for those who have extra money and are trying to figure out a way of investing it for the long-term. He believe in index funds and asset-based investing as the best path to success.
[a short pause while short-seller, derivative traders, and commodity brokers file out of the room]
For all of you still reading, I throughly recommend both of his books. Bernstein recommends The Four Pillars of Investing to "the liberal arts audience" and The Intelligent Asset Allocator "for the sophisticated investor".
In the first book, Bernstein explains the Four Pillars as history, theory, psychology, and business. He takes time to explain how "The Market Is Smarter Than You", how "Your Broker Is Not Your Friend", and "Neither Is Your Mutual Fund". He ends the book explain how to create a portfolio of the right asset types to minimize risk while maximizing returns.
In The Intelligent Asset Allocator, you need to already be on the bandwagon. He spends a little time talking about historical returns and the wide variation of the last 80 years. Shortly thereafter, the reader will find themselves in the world of standard deviation, correlation, and mean-variance optimizers. This is for the investors who has already drunk the Kool-aid and now wants to mix some for themselves.
I continue to enjoy the Five Best feature in the Weekend Edition of the Wall Street Journal. A few weeks ago, they talked to their resident columnist Jonathan Clements about personal investing titles. He recommends the following:
Read Clements' commentary on each of the books at the WSJ site.
Stanley Bing provided his Five Best on Saturday. He recommended Art of War, The Prince, The Godfather, Emily Post's The Etiquette Advantage in Business, and The Cat In The Hat. In this case, it is all about the commentary. Bing looks at the Dr. Suess tale as "a clever evocation of what happens to a corporation when a management consultant is hired by absent, clueless senior management to evaluate its organizational structure and to effect change." As I said, I suggest the commentary.
Here is a dump of some of those links that have been building up in my bookmarks:
In the Forbes' article that Tom referred to yesterday, the writer Dan Ackman pointed to a list of business books the magazine put together in 2002. Forbes calls these The 20 Most Influential Business Books. As you look down the panel experts, you'll notice our own Jack Covert was among those called to contribute. Since this was put together before the blog was born, I thought we should get it put up here.
They also organized the books and you will find some good commentary under the topics of management, narrative, biography and investing.
We don't do alot with personal finance here and more try to deal with the ups and down of business. I thought this was interesting though.
Wiley has published a book by three moderators from a Morningstar message board. The Diehards forum was started in 1998 and deals with the teachings of John Bogle, founder of Vanguard mutual funds. Their site brings in 25,000 people a day and can have hundreds of posts with people asking questions.
In The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing, Taylor Larimore, Mel Lindauer, and Michael LeBeoeuf are about making it simple for beginners. You will find sections on making sure your savings enough, asset allocation, and taxes. John Bogle has even written the foreword to the book and we have posted it over on the excerpt blog.
We did this last fall and thought you might enjoy another look at the season ahead.
So, here are the books we think you should be watching for in the first part of 2006.
Richard Pachter of the Miami Herald reviews three personal finance books to get your finances in order for the New Year.
The Weekend Edition of the Wall Street Journal asked tax expert Randy Blaustein for good books on the IRS and your taxes.
Blaustein also has a book called How to Do Business With the IRS: The Complete Guide for Tax Professionals (out of print).
I have a simple request: go read The Number, now.
We have seen this book coming ever since this summer. Free Press has gone to extreme lengths to make this a big book. We got the manuscript in July. Jack and I both read it. We thought it was brilliant.
The publisher printed 3,500 hardcover preview copies. That is unheard of. Publishers never want to spend this kind of money to promote a book. We used 100 copies of the special edition to spread to our movers and shakers.
This Saturday, I was in Barnes and Noble and the book was everywhere. It was on the front table. It was in personal finance section. There was even a special table sitting next to the checkout line with a sign asking "What is Your Number?"
Jeffrey Trachtenberg wrote a piece last month for the Wall Street Journal talking about all that Free Press has done to roll this book out. What is missing from the article is one thing -- the book is really good and that is why it will do well. In three months, people will be talking about this book like they talk about Freakonomics.
Let's get past the hype. This weekend, the book was reviewed in the Wall Street Journal by Glenn Ruffenach, editor for their retirement sections. Ruffenach's biggest problem with the book is that Lee Eisenberg suggests tried and true methods for reaching retirement with the money you need. I have two responses:
I think the storytelling is going to help people appreciate the simple but tough things that they need to do to prepare for retirement.
One more time...just so I am clear- go read The Number.
One of my favorite books this year is The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism: How the financial system undermined social ideals, damaged trust in the markets, robbed investors of millions—and what to do about it by John C. “Jack” Bogle, the founder of Vanguard (i.e. the pioneer of no-load index funds, which revolutionized the industry). This ambitious book requires your full attention. Bogle draws from his authority as a key player in the world of finance over the past 50 years, who has revolutionized the investment industry, witnessed huge changes, and never backed down from a fight. His book takes on the whole rotten system, and bears reading for a number of reasons.
Battle tackles the systematic rot gnawing at the effectiveness of large corporations, the power of small investors to beat the system, and the integrity of enterprise as many of us see it. Bogle cites isolates trends that other writers have noted, such as out-of-control CEO compensation, the dereliction of duty by boards, the systemic siphoning of profits away from investors by conglomerate-owned managed funds, and weaves them all together into a compelling overall argument. Not only that, but he writes wonderfully, to boot. It’s hard to argue with a book so smart and persuasive. The first chapter is available online as an excerpt. Here’s a nugget that I particularly enjoyed:
Over the past century, a gradual move from owner’s capitalism—providing the lion’s share of the rewards of the investment to those who put up the money and risk their own capital—has culminated in an extreme version of managers’ capitalism—providing vastly disproportionate rewards to those whom we have trusted to manage our enterprises in the interest of their owners. Managers’ capitalism is a betrayal of owners’ capitalism, a system that worked, albeit imperfectly, with remarkable effectiveness for the better part of the past two centuries, beginning with the Industrial Revolution as the eighteenth century turned to the nineteenth.
Earlier this fall I had the chance to do a question and answer with the man called Jack. Here’s what he said.
Q: Jack, you are one of the most influential investment figures of the past 50 years. Why have you written this book?
A: This is meant to be a lot more than a business book. It addresses this country’s role in the world, and our faltering practice of capitalism. We have turned a system of owners’ capitalism (where the idea is to earn the maximum return on the capital invested by the owners) into managers’ capitalism. In corporate America, the investor-owner is now at the bottom of the food chain, and managers are at the top. And there’s a very simple equation at stake here: the more that managers of America take, the less that investors make. This formula may not be up there with “e=mc squared,” but it is tautologically true. I say in the book that if investment returns are 7 percent annually and the system takes 2.5 percent then you are left with only 4.5 percent.
One key problem is that we’ve gone from an own-a-stock society to a rent-a-stock one, which has a terrible impact on the shareholders. When, as Larry Summers asked, was the last time you washed a rental car? Likewise, when was the last time someone voted a rental stock? The typical fund manager with all that turnover doesn’t care about real business value. And index managers, on the other hand, can’t follow that threadbare rule of ‘if you don’t like the manager sell the stock.’ Instead, they should be advocating a model of ‘if you don’t like the management then change the manager.’ They should be an activist in corporate proxies, by putting proposals in the proxy to limit compensation, for example, and by nominating directors. But you can’t find a fund manager like this. When was the last time there was any proxy proposal raised by a mutual fund? Isn’t that amazing for an industry which owns 28 percent of corporate America?
It’s very clear from a statistical standpoint that all this high turnover is to the disadvantage of fund shareholders. When I came into this industry, turnover was around 15-16 percent annually, and now it is 100 percent. This just doesn’t work in the long run. Fund shareholders will eventually gravitate toward more intelligently run mutual funds. They will encourage funds to focus more on the long run than the short run. People laugh at me, but it is going to happen. These ideas are on the right side of history. They are so fundamentally common sense.
Q: Your book takes on more than fund management however. It critiques the way corporate boards govern and how CEOs manage their companies. Why take such a systematic approach?
A: It’s all of a piece. You have the CEO compensation issue, where the game becomes not to build the company but to build the price of the stock, and then to capitalize on stock options. The fact of the matter is that everyone knows that the value of the stock is the discounted future cash flow, plain and simple. That’s it. And yet we have this industry practicing witchcraft. You have CEOs promising earnings growth of 11 percent annually and delivering six. You wonder why they don’t get fired! The real question that motivates them is ‘how do I drive the stock up?’ And they do this by making outrageous projections and then doing whatever they can by hook or by crook to achieve these projections. And to accomplish this they bring others into the system. One of the most egregious examples of course is Enron, which involved conspiracy with the accountants. And why do the accountants conspire? Because on a basic level, the companies pay them. The companies pay five times as much for consulting services than for accounting, so, naturally, the accounting firms did not want to lose the consulting business. Then in the mutual fund business you have the failure of directors who are captive to the fund managers who sit on the other side of the table. These executives are generally the kind of men you’d like your daughter to marry—I’ve never met a corrupt person in the industry. But the industry itself is corrupt because it is taking too much money out of the returns and is ignoring its fiduciary duty to fund owners.
In the old days, directors answered directly to the stockholders. But we no longer have direct representation. That ended in 1981, which was the last year that more than 50 percent of public equities was owned by direct investors. We went from 92 percent of individual ownership in 1950 to 32 percent today. And what has emerged at the same time are financial agents whose ownership rose from 8 percent to 68 percent. Astonishing! But these agents don’t represent the interests of the principals . . . largely mutual fund shareholders and pension beneficiaries. Today the money management companies are largely owned by giant conglomerates, and their goal is to earn a return on their capital, not on your capital as a fund shareholder. They have a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders, and they also have to make as much money as possible for their owners. They are serving two masters. And what necessarily happens is that they serve the one that is paying their compensation. So you see it’s all of a piece.
Q: How do you change it?
A: I don’t think that change is going to be easy. The book is my attempt to give a little impetus to the changes that we have to make. When I say investors of the world unite, I mean it. There are several key things we must change. The biggest risk to our financial system is the failure of our retirement system. Right now half the savings assets of the American economy—nearly $10 trillion—are in retirement plans, which are failing badly. The problem is that over an investment lifetime only about 25 percent of the rewards go to the investors and 75 percent go to the intermediaries. We have to change this. We need to have a federal blue ribbon commission to study the entire system. Right now we have a whole series of isolated pockets of retirement savings when we need an integrated system—something that would be linked, for example to corporate 401k plans and corporate pension plans, which would be integrated with the social security system. But in order to do so we need to make sure that there is a federal standard of fiduciary duty. We need to codify that standard and state what it means. We also need to have a massive education campaign so that investors understand simple investment fundamentals, and the confiscatory power of trading costs and fund expenses. The sooner investors look after their own economic interests the better off they will be.
Q: You continue to advocate index funds. Couldn’t your prescriptions be seen as somewhat self-serving?
A: I don’t see how. Vanguard index funds are the core of what I am talking about today: giving the investor no more and no less than his or her fair share of whatever returns the financial markets are kind enough to deliver. That’s just what I said in my senior thesis from college in 1951 and have said ever since. I have no vested interest in whether or not Vanguard gets bigger.
I do believe that we are seeing some positive change. The best investors today are accepting the message of index funds and low-cost investing. Peter Lynch said years ago that most investors would be better off with an index fund. How could he be wrong? The numbers are there. Jack Meyer, who is leaving Harvard, says the investment industry is a giant scam. And David Swensen of Yale calls the mutual fund industry a colossal failure for individual investors. You can even go back to the legendary Benjamin Graham, who in a late interview in 1976 seemed to indicate that indexing was the best strategy. Nobel Laureate Paul Samuelson challenged those who had brute evidence that management worked in favor of the investor to prove it. He’s still waiting. Warren Buffett has recommended low cost index funds for decades. If those investors are all agreeing, then sooner or later people will sit up and take attention. When the dumb investor realizes how dumb he is and buys an index fund, he immediately becomes a smart investor.
For investors to gain the almost universally accepted benefits of maximum diversification, they must have intermediaries, whether pension funds or other managed funds, to pool their resources and own literally hundreds of stocks and bonds. So agents are necessary; we have an agency society. And the whole darn book can be summed up by the fact that these agents aren’t representing their principals. We need a fiduciary society where we enjoin the agents to represent their principals, a society in which stewardship and trusteeship are the watchwords.
One of the treasures we uncovered on our trip to New York was a new edition to Napolean Hill's Think and Grow Rich from publisher Tarcher Penguin.
This is the grandfather of books on motivational thought. Hill was a journalist that Andrew Carnegie hired to find out what the formula of success was. In the 25 year journey to the answer, Hill interviewed 500 millionaires and published his finding in 1937. The book has sold over 15 million copies in its almost seven decade run.
There are several things I like about this new edition. This version was revised and updated by Arthur Pell. Some additional material uses more recent examples of Bill Gates and Michael Jordan to illustrate points. The packaging is well done with the rough cut pages and french covers (i.e. a soft cover with folded flaps to mimic a dust cover). And it's only $10. You rarely see me mention price, but that is a great price point.
Here are some books we are liking for the fall.
Competition Demystified by Bruce Greenwald and Judd Kahn (Aug.) - The author revisit and simplify Porter's Five Forces. I was skeptical, but they sold me in the introduction.
First in Thirst by Darren Rovell (Sept.) - This is a interesting brand biography on Gatorade. You will see this book on the BBBT at the end of September.
Bag the Elephant by Steve Kaplan (Sept.) - Bard Press puts out one book a year and each one is without fail is a great title. GUTS!, Marketing Outrageously, and Little Red Book of Selling were all from Bard Press. This year's book is about the idea of small business attracting and retaining big customers.
Radical Careering by Sally Hogshead (Sept.) - The book has great design and a powerful message. It reminds me of Fast Company in its heyday. Brand Autopsy has a nice preview.
Let My People Go Surfing by Yvon Chouinard (Oct.) - The Republic of Tea and Raising The Bar showed us there was a different way to do business. Patagonia founder Yvon Chouinard continues the tradition.
The Big Moo by Seth Godin and the Group 33 (Oct.) - The book is a perfect follow-up to Purple Cow.
The Number by Lee Eisenberg (Jan.) - This book takes a Gladwell-like look at retirement. The question is "What is your number?"
So, there is a little something for everyone to read this fall.
Enjoy!
The Wall Street Journal has published a book called Guide to The Business of Life. I think it is an interesting compilation of things that have been in the paper. I am going to published the Table of Content in the extended section so you can get a flavor for what is offered.
Here is a piece from Chapter 7 - The Great Game: Buying, Financing, and Keeping A Car In Shape:
The Musts of Resale Value
The time to consider a car's resale value is when you buy it. Dealers will tell you that some features that you may pay extra for up front are worth it when it comes time to trade in or sell. The big ones:
Bigger engines are usually better. Go for the six cylinder, not the four-banger.
Silver is a classic color. So are black and white.
Power is good. In these days when people are accustomed to powered appliances, make sure your car has power locks operated with a remote, keyless entry; power windows and cruise control. Power seats aren't a bad idea either.
Tinny FM radios won't do. Go for the CD player (or on newers models, MP3 players).
Spring for cowhide. Buyers love the smell of leather interiors, and they hold up better than cloth.
Shiny is best. Alloy wheels are popular; they help keep your car looking sharp.
Table of Contents
Chapter One - Getting There: The Secrets of The Savvy Traveler
Chapter Two - Creature Comforts on The Road
Chapter Three - Getting Pampered, Having Fun and Roughing It: Leisure and Adventure Travel
Chapter Four - Logistics: The Nuts and Bolts of Travel
Chapter Five - After Hours
Chapter Six - Gadgets: Learning to Speak Geek
Chapter Seven - The Great Game: Buying, Financing, and Keeping Your Car In Shape
Chapter Eight - Real Estate: Buying, Selling, and Upgrading Your Home
Chapter Nine - Health and Fitness: Taking Control of Yourself
Chapter Ten - Education: The Long Haul
Chapter Eleven - Life is a Tightrope: Balancing Work and Life
Chapter Twelve - Financing Your Life: The New Realities
Chapter Thirteen - Shopping: The Nation's New Sex
A number of recent hearings, articles, and other events have given new currency, so to speak, to a recently touted personal finance title, All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Plan. What’s new? The passage of the bankruptcy bill, for one, as well as the recent Senate hearing on the implications of this bill on credit card disclosure. In addition, both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal have published excellent articles on the key trends concerning troubling personal finance trends, the myth of class mobility, and the explosion of personal debt in the U.S.
Consider the following quote from the May 17 Journal article. “For Americans who aren’t getting a big boost from workplace raises, easy credit offers a way to get ahead, at least for the moment. To some, the expansion of credit is a milestone of democracy, giving middle- and lower-income people financial flexibility that only the rich used to enjoy. Others see the borrowing binge as a way for average households to make up for sluggish growth in income over the past several decades. Since 1990, income for the median American household has risen only 11% after adjusting for inflation, while median household spending has jumped at 30%, according to an analysis by Economy.com. How could the typical family afford to spend so much? Median household debt outstanding has jumped by 80%.”
We recently mentioned several worthy personal finance titles. Now, given the continuing debate over the structure of personal debt and its role in the economy, it seems like a good time to check back in with co-authors Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi of All Your Worth. By the way, another excellent book on this topic is Credit Card Nation by Robert Manning, a strident and convincing effort which is backed by an excellent website.
Q) Please explain how your background in the broader financial landscape
affects your advice to individuals.
A) Elizabeth is a professor at the Harvard Law School. She’s been doing original empirical research since 1981. Amelia has an MBA from Wharton, and she is a former consultant with McKinsey and Company. Together, we embarked on innovative research into the financial state of the modern American family. What we found alarmed us. The rules of money have changed, and families—millions of ordinary, hard-working, middle-class people with good educations and decent jobs—are living on the financial edge. It became very clear that the old harangues to “use double coupons” and “just save more” aren’t cutting it. To get ahead in today’s economy, families Americans need specific tools that help them take control over all their spending –from the mortgage right down to the tube of toothpaste.
Q) How does the recent passage of the bankruptcy bill affect the advice you
give in your book?
A) It makes us want to shout the advice from the rooftops—with a bullhorn! The safety net is fraying, and that means families need to take stronger steps to protect themselves. This bill means that there is even less margin for error, and that Americans need to be savvier than ever if they are going to get ahead.
Q) Your book rebuts the received wisdom of most books about personal finance. Without naming names, what would you say are the worst sins of personal finance titles? What types of commonly touted wisdom would you caution folks to avoid above all?
A) Worst advice: Cut out the lattes, save a few pennies here and a few nickels there, and all your financial problems will magically disappear. The truth is, if you can’t afford a latte, you can’t afford your life. You are in need of a comprehensive overhaul. Not only is the “latte problem” not real (as the data prove), it is dangerous. This advice has encouraged millions of Americans to spend all their time focusing on the pennies, while ignoring their real problem – they are spending too many dollars on big-ticket items. But this advice continues to get shelled out, not because it is true, but because it is so much easier to shake a finger over too many frivolous things without giving any hard advice on how to take control over the things that really matter.
Second worst advice: Put a second mortgage on your house to pay off credit card bills. The advisers do a few quick calculations and claim you can save a few dollars on interest. They never mention that if anything goes wrong and you can’t pay all those bills, you will lose the roof over your head! Credit card companies can’t take your home, but home equity lenders sure can; that’s the only reason they give those preferred rates to begin with.
Third worst advice: To get into the stock market, you must spend zillions of hours researching stocks and bonds and hundreds of new financial gizmos (or hire someone who will spend zillions of hours on your behalf). This is absurd—and it keeps people on the sidelines when they should just jump in. A simple indexed mutual fund will do the trick for most people, and it takes only a few minutes to shop for.
How a book is packaged can make all the difference.
HarperBusiness has re-released the 1949 text of Benjamin Graham's The Intelligent Investor and the book is gorgeous. I don't think the picture does it justice. They used great red cloth on the covers. There is no dust jacket. There is a simple plate on the front with the title and author and a plate on the back with a summary and author information. The pages are rough cut. I love the whole package.
I think it is a perfect gift for the investor in your life.
On the front page of yesterday's Wall Street Journal was an outstanding article (sub. needed) on the future of the stock market.
Jeremy Siegel is a professor at Wharton and he has been a big supporter of stocks as a long-term investment. His book Stocks for the Long Run has sold 350,000 copies.
Siegel has a new book and he has changed his tune. In The Future for Investors, he says that the coming retirement of the baby boomers will cause the stock market to tank. On the supply side, boomers will be selling stocks and bonds to maintain their quality of life. On the demand side, there will not be enough investors to buy up all of these assets and prices will fall (the ratio of workers to retirees will drop from today's 4.9 to 1 to 2.6 to 1 over the next thirty years). The only savior, Siegel claims, could be the growing economies of India, China, and other developing nations.
What makes the article great is the counterpoint that Robin Brooks offers. Brooks is an economist from the IMF and he says Siegel is all wet. He talks about how 10% of individuals in the US hold 88% of stocks and how this segment will not need to sell large portions of their portfolios.
This sums up the article:
"Whether we will see some sort of crash or slow crumble over the next decade or so, I don't know," says Andrew Abel, another finance professor from Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. "But it is certainly likely enough that it has gotten to enter into people's planning."
Richard Pachter of the Miami Herald reviews three luck books this week - Make Your Own Luck, How To Create Your Own Luck, and Lucky or Smart?.
To coincide with our birthday, it is also Tax Day.
The book connection would be Many Unhappy Returns: One Man's Quest To Turn Around The Most Unpopular Organization In America by by Charles O. Rossotti.
No one believed the IRS could ever run like a twenty-first-century business. Until it did.When Charles O. Rossotti became Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in 1997, the agency had the largest customer base-and the lowest approval rating-of any institution in America. Mired in scandal, caught in a political maelstrom, and beset by profound management and technology problems, the IRS was widely dismissed as a hopelessly flawed enterprise.
In Many Unhappy Returns, Rossotti-the first businessperson to head the IRS-recounts the remarkable story of his leadership and transformation of this much-maligned agency. In the glare of intense public scrutiny, he effected dramatic changes in the way the IRS did business-while it continued to collect $2 trillion in revenue.
Through fascinating accounts of heated Congressional hearings, encounters with Washington bigwigs, frank exchanges with taxpayers and employees, and risky turnaround strategies, Rossotti serves up a colorful story of leadership and change against daunting odds. He also underscores why every honest taxpayer should demand reform in the broader U.S. tax system.
Infused with keen wit and hard-won business wisdom, Many Unhappy Returns illuminates the perils and possibilities of leading large, complex organizations in a transparent world.
This is one of those items that has been sitting on my desk for a couple of weeks. A few weeks ago, the topic of the Journal Report in the WSJ was How to Save for College. Don Taylor, an associate professor at The American College, put together a list of books and documents "for helping parents plan for the high cost of higher education."
There are some unfortunate genres, such as self-help books, that are littered with crap. Personal finance books are another field of dreck. Let’s not name names. But in the former I shy away from cheesy, desperate, unctuous, and superficial books; and in the latter I pretty much avoid…the same.
Good news. The last six months have been a very good time for finance books, with a new release capping this encouraging phase. Any discussion must start by touting Eric Tyson and his lovely Personal Finance for Dummies. This book certainly isn’t new, but it occupies a special place in my heart—not simply as the best of the (often dismissed) Dummies line, but as an excellent blend of wisdom and practicality and clear advice on how to proceed.
But what’s new? First off, three titles from Portfolio. Last year Jean Chatzky spoke to us about her new, excellent book Pay It Down: From Debt to Wealth on $10 a Day. Her publisher has wisely reissued her prior book The Ten Commandments of Financial Happiness: Feel Richer with what You’ve Got, which is another smart guide that addresses the key human and emotional aspects that lead to financial discipline, and health.
Add to this list the clever Bad Debt, Good Debt: Knowing the Difference can Save your Financial Life from Jon Hanson. Debt, says Hanson, is neither good nor bad. It simply is. Having too much is bad, while having a manageable level in terms of the overall picture is acceptable. His book benefits enormously from his perspective, as he shares how himself was plagued by the demons. He speaks as one who learned his lessons from hard experience. A smart and engaging read.
But the real deal is All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Plan by Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Tyagi Warren.
Why? This book raises the bar for all other personal finance books by shifting the way in which it is discussed. These authors have a fundamental understanding of both the economic context driving household decisions, and the individual makeup that often leads people to poor choices. They deal with both threads, and in the process present the challenge of managing money proportionally in the scheme of life. Their core argument is that people must balance their financial life—to allocate wisely between essentials, wants, and savings. Sure, this sounds like common sense. But when is common sense common? And how many of us really do live by a consistent set of financial principles?
Principle is actually the key word here. For while the authors share a wealth of tips, many of their tactics, while wise, feel almost perfunctory, an almost tacit admission that so much financial advice is a mere intellectual commodity. These authors seem more comfortable drawing from a deep and abiding set of principles culled from experience. Mom teaches bankruptcy law at Harvard Law School; daughter is a former consultant and HBS grad. Together they wrote the The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-class Parents Are Going Broke, a brilliant book detailing the vast changes in the personal finance landscape of the past two decades. The rules have changed profoundly, they argue, for most Americans. Paying for the essentials of life, such a mortgage and health care has become a more difficult challenge for myriad reasons, among them a different attitude about lending standards.
Their background deeply informs this personal finance book. They understand the primary importance of establishing a budget that deals with first things first—the essentials of life that occupy a disproportionately high a percentage of spending for too many Americans. They focus their advice on achieving a balance of paying for essentials, for fun, and for savings. Their advice doesn’t offer trivial solutions to profound problems (by showing how to clip coupons for example.) It helps people stay focused on the most important financial issues that rule their life.
The enduring value of this book comes from a sensible, informed, and even passionate voice of reason about how individuals today can make the right financial decisions. Moreover, given the current march of the terrible bankruptcy bill in congress, the book couldn’t be more timely.
To read the intro to the book, click here. And, click here for an author Q&A.
Every year Warren Buffet writes the Annual Letter to Shareholders for Berkshire Hathaway.
I think they are required reading for any business person. This is the rare chance to read what the Oracle of Omaha has to say on the year past.
Download here now.
Michael at Canadian Headhunter sums up the philosophies of three "How to Become Millionaire" experts.
If any of their teachings strucks a chord, here are said experts and their books:
Tom Stanley
Robert Kiyosaki
David Bach
[via businesspundit]